From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Import substitution is a trade and economic policy based on the
premise that a developing country
should attempt to substitute products which it imports (mostly finished goods)
with locally produced substitutes. This usually involves government subsidies
and high tariff
barriers to protect local industries and hence import substitution policies are
not favored by advocates of absolute free trade. In addition
import substitution typically advocates an overvalued currency to allow easier
purchase of foreign goods and capital controls.
Import substitution policies were adopted by most nations in Latin
America in the 1950s and 1960s. They were rejected by most
nations in East Asia in the 1960s, and
many economists attribute the
superior performance of East Asia in the 1970s and 1980s to this difference in
policies. Typically, import substitution policies would result in inefficient
industries which created a drag on the economy.
In addition, the focus of import substitution in promoting industrialization
typically resulted in policies which benefited industrial workers at the expense
of farmers which made up most of the population of the nations involved. For
example to reduce the cost of industrialization, the cost of food was often
fixed at an artificially low level. In addition the licensing schemes required
for an import substitution strategy led also to rent seeking behaviors
which increased economic inefficiency.
In order to build up their manufacturing bases, many countries imposed high
tariffs on manufactured goods, so that multinational companies would instead
produce or assemble them locally. One example of this was in the motor industry,
in which manufacturers exported vehicles in 'completely knocked down' (CKD) kit
form, for local assembly. This often resulted in products that were of poorer
quality and more expensive than those imported 'completely built up'. It also
became increasingly inefficient for manufacturers to have identical products
assembled locally in several countries in the same region, which only served to
duplicate resources and reduce economies of scale.
As a result of the East Asian experience, import substitution policies
generally became unpopular by the mid-1980s and was largely rejected by the Washington
consensus.
However many economists have pointed out that the failure of import
substitution should not necessarily be taken as an endorsement of free trade.
They note that most East Asian countries
while rejecting import substitution also maintained high tariff barriers. The
strategy followed by those countries was to focus subsidies and investment on
industries which would make goods for export. The focus on export markets
allowed them to create competitive industries.
By the end of the 1990's, the Washington
consensus was being severely questioned. Nevertheless, there has not been a
return to import substitution as a developmental strategy.
See also:border
friction, Singer-Prebish
Thesis, Export
Oriented Industrialization